Task 3 (page 21)

Here is a sample paragraph for Task 3 on page 21. Note that this is slightly longer than you would be expected to write, because I did not use "Study 1" and "Study 2", but actually used the researchers' names and the year of publication. This increased the word count.

What you need to remember is to 1) give a brief one-sentence summary of the studies with proper citation, and 2) answer every point given to you (e.g. give one similarity, give one strength, etc.).

Both Ramida (1998) and and Farr et al. (2012) conducted studies to see how a dosage of aspirin would affect subjects’ blood pressure. In Ramida’s (1998) study, 328 patients with mild high blood pressure and a mean age of 44 years were given 100 mg of aspirin each morning. In Farr et al.’s (2012) study, 75 mg of aspirin was given daily to 2,719 patients, all older than 65 years, with high blood pressure. Both studies used a randomized control group, to allow comparison. The results of both studies showed a drop in subjects’ blood pressure, but only Ramida (1998) saw a statistically significant decrease in the experimental group. The strengths of Ramida’s (1998) study were the use of a randomized control group who received a placebo (to minimize the placebo effect), as well as double blinding, to reduce researcher bias. While Farr et al.’s (2012) research, did not use either a placebo or double blinding, it used a much larger sample, which allows for stronger statistical analyses. The findings from both studies would seem to have implications for the use of aspirin in treating high blood pressure, as both studies did see some decrease in blood pressure in the subjects receiving aspirin. However, since Farr et al.’s (2012) research did not uncover a significant drop, and a decrease was even seen in the control group subjects studied by Ramida (1998), further research on the effect of aspirin on blood pressure is needed. More specifically, it would seem that research should focus on patients with mild high blood pressure, as these were the subjects who saw a statistically significant reduction after receiving aspirin, as seen in Ramida’s (1998) study.

Remember, in the exam, one of the studies will be "yours", as in, you must pretend that you conducted a study with the details given to you and discuss it like it was your own.

You may use "In our study, we did not use double blinding, which may have led to some researcher bias", for example, if you were pretending to be Farr and colleagues.

Sample Results Paragraph

Here is a sample results paragraph for the cholera experiment in your book. (Note that this uses first person, which is acceptable when talking about your own study.)

Our theory was that water polluted with sewage was responsible for the spread of cholera, not the ‘miasma.’ The results confirm that hypothesis.  Clearly the highest death toll was among households who drank water from the pump supplied by the Southwark and Vauxhall Company which drew its supply from the polluted section of the Thames where sewage was disposed of.  Households using the water from the Lambeth Company had one-tenth the number of deaths from cholera. This water was drawn from the less polluted section of the river and it could be identified by the salt content.  There were some deaths in households who used the Lambeth Company also.  This is not surprising as people had to access their water from public pumps in the street so it is extremely likely that there would be some crossover perhaps because an individual did not want to queue at the Lambeth Company pump or because neighbors who used different water shared food or drink and so the infection could be spread that way.  There needs to be further testing to confirm the hypothesis, but because of the number of fatalities from cholera, the pumps supplied by the Southwark and Vauxhall Company should be immediately closed.

Major Project Guidelines

Sorry about the lateness of this post! Time sure flies!

Remember to follow the guidelines for the project on your handout. Scoring will be as follows:

  Online component

•       You will be expected post at least two drafts of your project for your friends to comment on.

•       You will also be expected to comment on at least two friends’ blogs.

•       On your major project, you’ll have to write down who commented on your work and whether or not you too their advice. If no one commented, discuss briefly how you edited your work. (This will be under the Notes section.)

Paper component 

•       You must have both a summary of the article along with your critique. 

•       You must use hedging where appropriate. 

•       You must follow the assignment guidelines. 

Final score will be:

•       Content = 8

•       Organization = 2

•       Language = 5

•       Assignment components (including notes) = 5

•       Assignment format = 1

•       Online drafts = 2

•       Blog comments = 2

•       Total = 25 points

Find hedging techniques you can use here:

http://www.uefap.com/writing/feature/hedge.htm